| Do your History textbooks tell you these Facts? |
2004 written ~ 2004 published
| Part 2 When Christian Missionary became the Teacher of the Hindu Society |
When Braahman was NO MORE ALLOWED TO REMAIN the Teacher of Hindu society
Ch-1 Intellectual Conspiracy and Social Fraud of immense magnitude
About Max Muller
Source: INDIA what can it teach us? F Max Muller, ISBN 0-14-100437-1 [2000]
Max Muller (1823-1900) has long been regarded as the ‘Western Indologist par excellence’. He was born on 6 December, 1823 in Dessau, the capital of the German Duchy of Anhalt-Dessau. His father Wilhelm Muller (1794-1827), a famous poet and teacher, died leaving his wife and two young children in dire poverty, supported only by a modest pension. After his early years in Dessau, he was sent at the age of twelve to Leipzig to finish his schooling, receiving a thorough grounding in Greek and Latin. As a student at Leipzig University, he fought duels and left with a doctorate before he was twenty. After his wanderjahre spent in Berlin, Paris and London, he arrived in Oxford in 1848, where he settled. He became Taylorian Professor of Modern European Languages (1854), a Fellow of All Souls College (1858) and Professor of Comparative Philology (1868). Max Muller’s oeuvre was marked by encyclopaedic range and scholarship. His edition of the Rig Veda (1849-73), and the forty-nine volumes of the Sacred Books of the East, made Max Muller pre-eminent among interpreters of Indian thought in the West. His work on Vedic literature, Sanskrit, philology, mythology and comparative religion aroused wide interest. He was an important influence not only on his Western contemporaries, but also on Indian thinkers. Max Muller died on 28 October, 1900.
Two faces of Max Muller
Source: INDIA what can it teach us? Max Muller, p 50
Max Muller: It is extremely strange that whenever, either in Greek, or in Chinese, or in Persian, or in Arab writings, we meet any attempts at describing the distinguishing features in the national character of the Bhaaratiyas (*Hindus), regard for truth and justice should always be mentioned first.
This was Max Muller in 1882 at Cambridge University in England. By then he had substantially matured in life and acquired the much needed wisdom that comes with age. He had also approached closer to his grave when people tend to admit the truth more easily than in their youth when survival and ambitions take precedence in life. Therefore, be prepared to see yet another face of the same Max Muller in his youth, much influenced by the 1st Baron of erstwhile British Empire Lord Thomas Babington Macaulay. That will tell you the reason why you hold today such a low opinion of Hindu society.
It is a story of intellectual fraud carried out by eminent people of European society, mostly under British umbrella. It was a social fraud of an immense magnitude that blackened the face of an entire society. It was like painting milk white with charcoal black. It was much like covering bright sun shine with the dead of night. And the most amazing thing that you will notice from their personal admissions is that it was their Christian faith, the belief in Jesus and his doctrine, which drove them towards carrying out a social fraud of this magnitude. Mention of Jesus at this point may surprise you but to understand Jesus well you may have to read my other works on Christianity. This work will quote only those teachings of his which are relevant to the context. This is a work on history and if religious teachings are quoted occasionally then it is to demonstrate what shaped those historical events. At this moment, these are only words but as you will progress through my work these words will come alive as hard facts of history, which had been deliberately withheld from common knowledge of the Hindu society in particular, and the world at large.
Conspiracy and Conspiracy of Silence
Conspiracy has been defined by Oxford Dictionary as a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful
The phrase a conspiracy of silence has been defined by Oxford Dictionary (p 393) as an agreement to say nothing about an issue that should be generally known.
You have witnessed glimpses of an amazing character of Hindu society in course of your journey through earlier part of this work
Now, this part of your journey will take you through the amazing conspiracy which consigned that civilization into oblivion. As you will progress you will notice that the sole objective of these intellectual conspirators was to convert Hindus into Christianity and thus gradually eliminate Hinduism.
I call it a conspiracy because the victims were not aware of the motive
A conspiracy of silence has been maintained on this subject because 99.9% Hindus today are not aware of this. Out of one billion Hindus world over, you may find it difficult to locate even that minuscule 0.1% (1 million or 10 lakh) Hindus who know about all this.
This would be our approach
We will go about this whole issue in a sequential manner; first looking into the driving force, then the motive, finally the methodology and its systematic and consistent implementation.
Listen to it in their own words; it was the religion that drove them all along! When you think it was their nationality you are identifying the wrong culprit
Professor Wilson says he wrote those lectures to disprove Hinduism
Source: Eminent Orientalists, Madras, p 72 quoted in Western Indologists A Study in Motives.htm, Purohit Bhagavan Dutt
Purohit Bhagavan Dutt: Prof Wilson was a man of very noble disposition, but he had his obligations towards the motives of the founder of the Chair he occupied. He, therefore, wrote a book on ‘The Religious and Philosophical System of the Hindus’ and explaining the reason for writing it he says;
Prof Wilson: These lectures were written to help candidates for a prize of [Pounds] 200 given by John Muir, a well-known old Haileybury man and great Sanskrit scholar, for the best refutation of the Hindu Religious System.
Refute repel, reject, disprove Collins English Dictionary p 432
Thus the tool was created with the sole objective of demoting Hindu religious system. And it was financed by one who was known as a great Sanskrit scholar. What did he find in Sanskrit literature that made him put up a prize money for denouncing Hindu religious system? Did he see the real strength of Sanskrit literature and felt insecure enough to use his loot money for further downgrading Hindu religious system? Here I refer to John Muir.
I speak of loot money because he and the likes of him earned their livelihood plus enormous amounts of money that they did not deserve by plunder (systematic loot) of Bengal and the rest of the BhaaratVarsh. Professor Wilson himself may not have wanted to do it and yet he may have succumbed to the pressure from his employers.
The other face of Max Muller
In earlier part of this work you have read how valiantly Max Muller fought for Hinduism in 1882 at Cambridge University. That was when he had matured sufficiently. Now, we will have a look at his youth-driven blunder amounting to intellectual conspiracy, which he sought to partially correct by the time he matured and nearing grave; but the enormous damage to Hinduism was done, and could not be reversed.
Max Muller was born in 1823. He acquired his doctorate before he was 20. He was a voluminous writer, and a forceful writer. He died in 1900.
1855 Max Muller at age 32 Macaulay poisons Max Muller’s mind
Source: Life and Letters of Max Muller, Vol I, Ch IX, p 171 quoted in Western Indologists A Study in Motives.htm, Purohit Bhagavan Dutt
Purohit Bhagavan Dutt: Max Muller’s interview with Lord Macaulay on the 28 December 1855 also played a great part in his anti-Bhaaratiya views. Max Muller had to sit silent for an hour while the historian poured out his diametrically opposite views and then dismissed his visitor who tried in vain to utter a simple word: “I went back to Oxford”, writes Max Muller, “a sadder man and a wiser man.”
1860 Max Muller at age 37 says the whole human race needs to admitted to the truth of Christianity; and obliquely pointing towards BhagavadGita, he says Hinduism, through its own errors, may have paved the way for Christ
Source: History of Ancient Sanskrit Literature, 1860, p 32 quoted in Western Indologists A Study in Motives.htm, Purohit Bhagavan Dutt
Max Muller: History seems to teach that the whole human race required a gradual education before, in the fullness of time, it could be admitted to the truths of Christianity. All the fallacies of human reason had to be exhausted, before the light of a high truth could meet with ready acceptance. The ancient religions of the world were but the milk of nature, which was in due time to be succeeded by the bread of life ... ‘The religion of Buddha has spread far beyond the limits of the Aryan world, and to our limited vision, it may seem to have retarded the advent of Christianity among a large portion of the human race. But in the sight of Him with whom a thousand years are but as one day, that religion, like the ancient religions of the world, may have but served to prepare the way of Christ, by helping through its very errors to strengthen and to deepen the ineradicable yearning of the human heart after the truth of God.
Max Muller displays such deep faith in Christianity and Christ that he claims all other religions needed to be raised to the level of Christianity!
Max Muller’s references to “the Aryan world” and to “in the sight of Him with whom a thousand years are but as one day” are pointers towards Hinduism. Without understanding what Bhagavaan Shri Krishn meant in Shrimad BhagavadGita Adhyaay 8 Shlok 17 Max Muller proceeds to claim “that religion may have served to prepare the way of Christ by helping through its very errors”. These pitiable characters, profoundly educated in Christian education system, speak of “ineradicable yearning of the human heart after the truth of God”! Their over inflated ego made them think of “whole human race required a gradual education before it could be admitted to the truths of Christianity”.
His own words make it abundantly clear leaving no doubt whatsoever that the assault on Hinduism was driven by his faith in Christianity and Jesus Christ.
1866 Max Muller at age 43 claims Vedic hymns are extremely childish and low grade
Source: Chips from a German Workshop, second edition, 1866, p 27 quoted in Western Indologists A Study in Motives.htm, Purohit Bhagavan Dutt
Max Muller: Large number of Vedic hymns are childish in the extreme; tedious, low, commonplace.
Max Muller had not yet risen in his life to the level where he could understand the depth of Vaidik (Vedic) literature. His mind was so very obsessed with supremacy of Christianity that it was simply not open to receive any thing nobler than its own. Twenty two years later he publicly acknowledged [see earlier parts of this work] supremacy of Hinduism and fought for it realizing his earlier mistake but by then it was too late and irreversible damage had been done!
1866 Max Muller at age 43 writes to his Wife that his translation of Rig’Ved will show Hindus how inferior is the root of their religion and that is the only way of uprooting them and destroying all that has sprung from that root during past thousands of years and that would seal the fate of the millions in BhaaratVarsh ~ Quite an irony that I grew up learning that Max Muller had done a great service to Hinduism by translating Veds and making them known to the whole world when we Hindus, ourselves, had ignored them and forgotten about them ~ Education system can do wonders by brainwashing children making the villain look like the savior and victims look like the culprits
Source: Life and Letters of Max Muller, Vol I, Ch XV, p 346 quoted in Western Indologists A Study in Motives.htm, Purohit Bhagavan Dutt
Purohit Bhagavan Dutt: In a letter of AD 1866 (Hindu Vikram Samvat 1923) he writes to his wife:
This edition of mine and the translation of the Ved will hereafter tell to a great extent on the fate of BhaaratVarsh ... it is the root of their religion and to show them what the root is, I feel sure, is the only way of uprooting all that has spring from it during the last three thousand years.
Source: Life and Letters, F Max Muller, Vol. I (London: Longmans, 1902), p 328 quoted in Shriram Sathe, Aryans: Who Were They? p 20 quoted in The Invasion That Never Was, Michel Danino, p 24
Max Muller to his wife: This edition of mine and the translation of the Ved will hereafter tell to a great extent on the fate of BhaaratVarsh and on the growth of millions of souls in that country. It is the root of their religion and to show them what the root is, I feel sure, is the only way of uprooting all that has spring from it during the last three thousand years.
Max Muller writes to his wife describing his planned strategy for uprooting Hindu heritage through his translation of RigVed by showing it in poor light.
And why did Max Muller do it? To get a share of the plunder and world wide recognition as an intellectual of eminence
Do you want to know who financed this operation? It was East India Company. They hired Max Muller to translate Rig’Ved. His time, body and mind were hired by the ChristianBritish East India Company with the sole motive of uprooting Hindus from their roots using translation of Rig’Ved as the weapon. This weapon was meant to be used against English educated Hindus who had no ability to read and understand Sanskrit on their own. And such English educated ChristianizedHindus were going to take the battle against Hinduism further down the lane. In return, Max Muller was to get plenty of money and world wide recognition.
[Re: funding by East India company, refer to F Max Muller, My Autobiography, (New York: 1901; reprint New Delhi: Asian Educational Services, 1993), pp 13, 201-202, 216 quoted in The Invasion That Never Was, Michel Danino, p 24]
Those who use their knowledge for such subversive purposes, I call them intellectual whores for they put on rent their body (physical abilities and energies), mind (mental abilities and energies) and time for pleasure of those like Macaulay and East India company.
Max Muller writes to his Son that in the order of superiority among all religious documentations in world with regard to moral teachings first comes the New Testament of Christian Bible, then Qur’an of Islam, then Old Testament of Christian Bible, followed by Buddhist, Chinese and in the end of the line stand Hindu Veds
Source: Life and Letters of Max Muller, Vol II, Ch XXXII, p 339 quoted in Western Indologists A Study in Motives.htm, Purohit Bhagavan Dutt
Purohit Bhagavan Dutt: In another letter he writes to his son:
Max Muller to his son: Would you say that any one sacred book is superior to all others in the world? ...I say the New Testament, after that, I should place the Koran, which in its moral teachings, is hardly more than a later edition of the New Testament. Then would follow according to my opinion the Old Testament, the Southern Buddhist Tripitaka, the Tao-te-king of Laotze, the Kings of Confucius, the Ved and the Avestha.
Max Muller writes to his son that in order of superiority in moral teachings, he places Christian Bible New Testament at 1st place, Islamic Qur’an at 2nd place, Christian Bible Old Testament in the 3rd place, then Buddhist, Chinese, and at the end of the line Hindu Veds and Persian Avestha. You have learned sufficiently about Hindu morals “in action” through testimonies presented in earlier parts of this work. You will get to witness plenty of Muslim morals through the real life conducts of the prophet and his followers as you proceed through this work. Now you are seeing what Christian morals are like because these conducts of those people are based on those very moral teachings of Christian Bible.
To put things in perspective it becomes necessary to bring in some specimen of those moral teachings from the New Testament, Qur’an and Old Testament so that you can form your own opinion about their superiority in comparison to Hinduism
Moral teachings of New Testament [Max Muller Ranks by Superiority 1st]
Source: Oxford Dictionary p 1249, p 792, p 1143
New Testament is the second part of the Christian Bible
Gospel is the record of Christ’s life and teachings in the first four books of the New Testament
St Matthew was an Apostle, and the author of the first Gospel
Source: Christian Bible New Testament
Matthew 10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. 10:35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against the mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. 10:36 And a man’s foe shall be they of his own household. 10:37 He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me. 12: 30 He that is not with me is against me
Source: Oxford Dictionary p 1099
St Luke was an evangelist, and the author of the third Gospel
Source: Christian Bible New Testament
Luke 12:51 Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division: 12:52 For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three. 12:53 The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. 14:26 If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.
Nay a negative answer Oxford Dictionary p 1237
Source: Myth of St Thomas & Mylapore Shiva Temple, Ishwar Sharan, p 76 n 36
Gospel of Thomas: the second century Coptic text of this Gnostic gospel, probably written in Syria, was discovered in Egypt in 1946. It contains the secret sayings of Jesus as recorded by St Thomas.
Source: Oxford Dictionary p 1928, p 77
St Thomas was an Apostle
Each of the twelve chief disciples of Jesus Christ is an Apostle
Source: Gospel of Thomas as quoted in The Myth of Saint Thomas and Mylapore Shiva Temple, p 76 n
Gospel of Thomas 16 Jesus said: Perhaps men think that I came to cast peace on the world; and they do not know that I came to cast division upon earth, fire, sword, war. For five will be in a house; there will be three against two and two against three, the father against the son and the son against the father. And they will stand because they are single ones. 56 Jesus said: He who will not hate his father and his mother cannot be my disciple. And he who will not hate his brothers and sisters, and carry his cross as I have, will not become worthy of me.
Source: Hindu Voice, Mumbai, Aug 2004, p 25
Swami Vivekananda: Christians talk of universal brotherhood; but anyone who is not a Christian must go to that place where he will be eternally barbecued (*roasted like animals).
Source: The Myth of Saint Thomas and Mylapore Shiva temple, p 120
Ishwar Sharan: Jesus was the first religious teacher in history to threaten those, who did not agree with him, with eternal damnation. This is the only original idea that he contributed to the world’s vast body of religious thought, and in two millennia it has destroyed nations and whole civilizations and caused Thomas Jefferson to declare, ‘The Christian God is cruel, vindictive, capricious and unjust’.
Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) 3rd President of the US 1801-9; he played key role in the American leadership during the War of Independence and was the principal drafter of the Declaration of Independence (1776) [p 979] damnation condemnation to eternal punishment in hell [p 463] eternal lasting or existing forever; without end or beginning [p 631] capricious given to sudden and unaccountable changes of mood or behavior [p 271] vindictive having or showing a strong or unreasoning desire for revenge [p 2062] [Oxford Dictionary]
Moral teachings of Qur’an [Max Muller's Ranking 2nd by Superiority]
Source: The Calcutta Qur'an Petition, p 255, Qur'an Soora 2, Aayat 193, al-Bakra ~ Allah to Muhammad at al-Madinaah
2:193 Fight against them until idolatry is no more and Allah’s religion reigns supreme.
Sura [Surah, Soora] a chapter or section of Qur’an Oxford, p 1866
Source: The Calcutta Qur'an Petition, p 255, Qur'an Soora 2, Aayat 216, al-Bakra ~ Allah to Muhammad at al-Madinaah
2:216 Fighting is obligatory for you, much as you dislike it.
Source: Qur’an Majeed, p 231, Soora 4 an-Nisa, Aayat 56, revealed by Allah to Muhammad at al-Madinaah
4:56 Lo! Those who disbelieve Our revelations, We shall expose them to Fire. As often as their skins are consumed We shall exchange them for fresh skins that they may taste the torment. Lo! Allah is ever Mighty, Wise.
Source: The Calcutta Qur'an Petition, p 256 Qur'an Soora 8 Aayat 12 al-Anfaal ~ Allah to Muhammad at al-Madinaah
8:12 I shall cast terror into the hearts of the infidels. Strike off their heads, maim them in every limb
Maim wound or injure (someone) so that part of the body is permanently damaged. Limb arm or leg of a person or four-legged animal, or a bird’s wing.
Source: The Calcutta Qur'an Petition, p 257 Qur'an Soora 8 Aayat 15-18 al-Anfaal ~ Allah to Muhammad at al-Madinaah
8:15-18 It was not you, but Allah, who slew them. It was not you who smote them; Allah smote them so that He might richly reward the faithful.
Source: The Calcutta Qur'an Petition, p 255, Qur'an Soora 8, Aayat 39, al-Anfaal ~ Allah to Muhammad at al-Madinaah
8:39 Make war on them until idolatry is no more and Allah’s religion reigns supreme.
Source: The Calcutta Qur'an Petition, p 259 Qur'an Soora 8 Aayat 67 al-Anfaal ~ Allah to Muhammad at al-Madinaah
8:67 It is not for any Prophet to have captives until he has made slaughter in the land…
Source: The Calcutta Qur'an Petition, p 259, Qur'an Soora 9, Aayat 2-3, at-Tauba ~ Allah to Muhammad at al-Madinaah
9:2-3 Allah will humble the unbelievers… Allah and His apostle are free from obligation to the idol-worshipper… Proclaim a woeful punishment to the unbelievers.
Source: The Calcutta Qur'an Petition, p 262, Qur'an Soora 9, Aayat 7, at-Tauba ~ Allah to Muhammad at al-Madinaah
9:7 Allah and His apostle repose no trust in idolaters…
Source: The Calcutta Qur'an Petition, p 257, Qur'an Soora 9, Aayat 39, at-Tauba ~ Allah to Muhammad at al-Madinaah
9:39 If you do not fight He will punish you sternly and replace you by other men...
Source: The Calcutta Qur'an Petition, p 255, Qur'an Soora 9, Aayat 41, at-Tauba ~ Allah to Muhammad at al-Madinaah
9:41 Whether unarmed or well equipped, march on and fight for the cause of Allah, with your wealth and your persons.
Source: The Calcutta Qur'an Petition, p 255 Qur'an Soora 9 Aayat 73 at-Tauba ~ Allah to Muhammad at al-Madinaah
9:73 O Prophet! Make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites. Be harsh with them. Their ultimate abode is Hell, a hapless journey’s end.
Hapless (especially of a person) unfortunate
Source: Qur'an Majeed, p 388, Soora 9 At-Tauba, Aayat 111, revealed by Allah to Muhammad at al-Madinaah
9:111 Lo! Allah hath bought from the believers their lives and their wealth because the Garden [*paradise] will be theirs: they shall fight in the way of Allah and shall slay and be slain. It is promise which is binding on Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur'an. Who fulfilleth His covenant better than Allah? Rejoice then in your bargain that ye have made, for that is the supreme triumph.
Gospel 1) the teaching or revelation of Christ 2) the record of Christ’s life and teachings in the first four books of the New Testament [the four Gospels ascribed to St Matthew, St Mark, St Luke, and St John] Oxford Dictionary p 792
Source: The Calcutta Qur'an Petition, p 255, Qur'an Soora 9, Aayat 123, at-Tauba ~ Allah to Muhammad at al-Madinaah
9:123 Believers! Make war on the infidels who dwell around you. Let them find harshness in you.
Source: A Hindu View of the World, N S Rajaram, p 44
Quran 9.123, 29, 5 Surely the worst beasts in God’s sight are the unbelievers. O ye who believe! Fight those of the unbelievers and let them find in you harshness. Humiliate the nonMuslims to such an extent that they surrender and pay tribute. Then, when the sacred months are drawn away, slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them and confine them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush.
Source: The Calcutta Qur'an Petition, p 266, Qur'an Soora 22, Aayat 19-21, al-Hazz ~ Allah to Muhammad at al-Madinaah
22:19-21 Garments of fire have been prepared for unbelievers. Scalding (*boiling) water shall be poured upon their heads, melting their skins and that which is in their bellies. They shall be lashed with red iron.
Source: The Calcutta Qur'an Petition, p 256 Qur'an Soora 47, Aayat 4-15, Muhammad ~ Allah to Muhammad at al-Madinaah
47:4-15 When you meet the unbelievers in the battlefield strike off their heads and when you have laid them low, bind your captives firmly. Then grant them their freedom or take ransom from them, until war shall lay down her armor. Thus shall you do! Had Allah willed, He could Himself have perished them (without your help); but He has ordained it thus that He might test you, the one by the other. As for those who are slain in the cause of Allah, He will not allow their works to perish. He will vouchsafe them guidance and ennoble their state; He will admit them to the Paradise He has made known to them.
Believers! If you help Allah, he will help you and make you strong. But the unbelievers shall be consigned to perdition (*eternal damnation). Because they have opposed His revelations, He will frustrate their works … Allah is the protector of the faithful; unbelievers have no protector. Allah will admit those who embrace the true faith to gardens (*paradise) watered by running streams. The unbelievers take their full of pleasure and eat as the beasts eat; but Hell shall be their home … They shall abide in Hell forever and drink scalding water, which will tear their bowels.
What has made it particularly alluring for the faithful throughout the ages is something else, namely, the bevy of beautiful virgins who never grow old or lose their charms, and who never tire of providing newer and ever more plentiful pleasures to those who have lived or died for the faith. Lusty and lurid descriptions of paradise comprise a whole corpus of Islamic lore starting with the Qur'an and the Hadis.
Source: The Calcutta Qur'an Petition, p 258 Qur'an Soora 48 Aayat 29 al-Fath ~ Allah to Muhammad at al-Madinaah
48:29 Muhammad is Allah’s apostle. Those who follow him are ruthless to the unbelievers but merciful to one another.
Source: The Calcutta Qur'an Petition, p 262, Qur'an Soora 60, Aayat 4, Al’mumtahana ~ Allah to Muhammad at al-Madinaah
60:4 We renounce you (i.e., the idolaters): enmity and hate shall reign between us until you believe in Allah only…
Source: The Calcutta Qur'an Petition, p 255, Qur'an Soora 66 Aayat 9 At’tahreem ~ Allah to Muhammad at al-Madinaah
66:9 O Prophet! Make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and deal sternly with them. Hell shall be their home, evil their fate.
Source: The Calcutta Qur'an Petition, p 257, Qur'an Soora 69, Aayat 30-33, al-Hakka ~ Allah to Muhammad at Mecca
69:30-33 We shall say, ‘Lay hold of him and bind him. Burn him in the fire of Hell, then fasten him with a chain seventy cubits long. For he did not believe in Allah, the Most High.
Source: Qur'an 4.91 as quoted in Eminent Historians... p 93
4:91 Then, if they turn their backs, take them and slay them wherever you find them.
Source: HadIs Saahih Bukhaari 84.57 quoted in Eminent Historians... pp 93-94
84:57 Whosoever changes his Islamic religion kill him.
Source: HadIs Saahih Bukhaari 82.794-7 and Saahih Muslim 4130-7 as quoted in Eminent Historians - Their Technology, Their Line, Their Fraud, p 94
82:794-7 The Prophet had them caught. He then ordered their hands and legs to be cut off, their eyes to be branded with heated pieces of iron. He ordered that the cut hands and legs should not be cauterized so that they bleed to death. ‘And when they asked for water to drink’, records the Hadis, ‘they were not given water.’
Source: Hindu Voice, August 2004, p 25
Swami Vivekananda: Mohammedans talk of universal brotherhood, but what comes out of that in reality? Why, anybody who is not a Mohammedan will not be admitted into the brotherhood; he will more likely have his throat cut.
Moral teachings of Old Testament [Max Muller's Ranking 3rd by Superiority]
Source: Oxford Dictionary p 1291 p 504
Old Testament is the first part of the Christian Bible
Deuteronomy is the fifth book of the Bible
Source: Christian Bible Old Testament
Deuteronomy 12:1 These are the statutes and judgments, which ye shall observe to do in the land, which the LORD God of thy fathers giveth thee to possess it, all the days ye live upon the earth. 12:2 Ye shall utterly destroy all the places, wherein the nations which ye shall possess served their Gods, upon the high mountains, and upon the hills, and every green tree: 12:3 And ye shall overthrow their altars, and break their pillars, and burn their groves with fire; and ye shall hew down the graven images of their gods, and destroy the names of them out of that place.
Source: Christian Bible Old Testament
Deuteronomy 13 Idolaters to be put to death
Deuteronomy 13:6 If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which is as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other Gods, which thou hast not known, nor thy fathers; 13:7 Namely, of the gods of the people which are round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth; 13:8 Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him: 13:9 But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shalt be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hands of all people. 13:10 And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the LORD thy God
Source: Christian Bible Old Testament
Deuteronomy 20:16 But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth: 20:17 But thou shalt utterly destroy them
Source: Christian Bible Old Testament
Deuteronomy 32:24 They shall be burnt with hunger, and devoured with burning heat, and with bitter destruction: I will also send the teeth of beasts upon them, with the poison of serpents of the dust. 32:25 The sword without, and terror within, shall destroy both the young man and the virgin, the suckling also with the man of gray hairs.
Source: Oxford Dictionary p 645
Exodus is the second book of the Bible
Source: Christian Bible Old Testament
Exodus 23:24 Thou shalt not bow down to their gods, nor serve them, nor do after their works: but thou shalt utterly overthrow them, and quite break down their images.
Exodus 34:13 But ye shall destroy their altars, break their images, and cut down their groves. 34:14 For thou shalt worship no other god: for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God:
Source: Oxford Dictionary p 1272
Numbers is the fourth book of the Bible
Source: Christian Bible Old Testament
Numbers 31:17 Now therefore kill every male among little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. 31:18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
Source: Oxford Dictionary p 966
Isaiah was a major Hebrew prophet
Isaiah is a book of Bible containing his prophecies
Source: Christian Bible Old Testament
Isaiah 13:16 Their children also shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be spoiled, and their wives ravished (*raped).
Source: Oxford Dictionary p 1228
Nahum a book of the Bible
Source: Christian Bible Old Testament
Nahum 1:2 God is jealous, and the LORD revengeth; the LORD revengeth, and is furious; the LORD will take vengeance on his adversaries, and he reserveth wrath for his enemies.
1868 Max Muller at age 45 writes to the Minister for BhaaratVarsh now that Hinduism is doomed Christianity must step in to fill the vacuum
Source: Life and Letters of Max Muller, Vol I, Ch XVI, p 378 quoted in Western Indologists A Study in Motives.htm, Purohit Bhagavan Dutt
Purohit Bhagavan Dutt: On 16th December 1868 AD (Samvat 1925) he writes to Duke of Argyle, the Minister for BhaaratVarsh:
Max Muller: The ancient religion of BhaaratVarsh is doomed and if Christianity does not step in, whose fault will it be?
The extent to which Max Muller goes to subvert Hinduism can be seen from this letter to the then Minister for BhaaratVarsh. Christianity’s assault on Hinduism explored every possible avenue of persuasion.
18?? Max Muller at age ?? charges N K Majumdar what stops you and your countrymen from openly following Christ now that English educated brass of your country is already converted to Christianity
Source: Life and Letters of Max Muller, Vol II, Ch XXXIV, pp 415-6 quoted in Western Indologists A Study in Motives.htm, Purohit Bhagavan Dutt
Purohit Bhagavan Dutt: Max Muller grew so insolent and audacious that he started to challenge Bhaaratiyas in a direct foolhardy manner. It is clear from a letter written by him to N K Majumdar:
Max Muller: Tell me some of your chief difficulties that prevent you and your countrymen from openly following Christ, and when I write to you I shall do my best to explain how I and many who agree with me have met them and solved them ... From my point of view, BhaaratVarsh, at least the best part of it, is already converted to Christianity. You want no persuasion to become a follower of Christ. Then make up your mind to work on yourself. Unite your flock - to hold them together and prevent them from straying. The bridge has been built for you by those who came before you. STEP BOLDLY FORWARD, it will break under you, and you will find many friends to welcome you on the other shore and among them none more delighted that your old friend and fellow labourer F Max Muller.
Do you notice the reach of religion in human lives? This is why I mix religion with history because human thoughts and actions can never be understood well without understanding the latent religious bias, and history is nothing but a compilation of human actions based on human beliefs shaped by religion, and therefore -
It may not be so apparent because they know how to hide their true feelings in public, if necessary, but their letters betray their innermost feelings. They found it simply intolerable that such a large mass of people should follow any religion other than Christianity. That intolerance is reflected through Max Muller’s tone in the letter.
1882 Max Muller at age 59 gains much needed wisdom and takes an about turn: I should point to BhaaratVarsh
Location: Cambridge University, England, Lecture 1 Source: INDIA what can it teach us? p 6
Max Muller: If I were to look over the whole world to find out the country most richly endowed with all the wealth, power and beauty, that nature can bestow, I should point to BhaaratVarsh. If I were asked under what sky the human mind has mostly deeply pondered over the greatest problems of life and has found solutions of some of them which well deserve the attention even of those who have studied Plato and Kant, I should point to BhaaratVarsh. And if I were asked myself from what literature, we here in Europe, we who have nurtured almost exclusively on the thoughts of Greeks and Romans, and of Semitic Race, the Jewish, may draw that corrective which is most wanted in order to make our inner life more perfect, more universal, in fact, more truly than, a life not for this life only, but a transfigured and eternal life, again I should point to BhaaratVarsh.
Here we see Max Muller reverse his stand
He had grown in age. With that came maturity. The ambition of youth had subsided. The hunger for recognition through support of British establishment had been fulfilled. The need and greed for money had reduced having already made enough. Now it was the beginning of a journey towards the grave. Time for reconciliation with truth.
But then few had the matching tenacity
In his youth he fought ferociously for Christianity. And now in his maturity he valiantly fought for the truth. Alas! The damage he had done in his youth, he could not undo it in his maturity.
Need to look at Max Muller in proper perspective
When we condemn Max Muller we do not want to look at his work; with that remains ignored the enormous documentary evidence he compiled in favor of Hinduism ~ who is the loser? There is no point bragging how great a nation we were. In today’s environment people want printed evidence. And that too, only such evidence that they feel trustworthy. ChristianEnglish education for past six generations has molded our thinking in such a direction that we consider only foreigners’ evidence as admissible. This makes Max Muller’s work very valuable to us. When we glorify Max Muller we also look very favorably at Germans and British ~ we remember them by their nationality. This glorification makes them respectable in our eyes. In the process, we fail to see the damage they have done to us.
They have cut us off our roots. They have made us forget our past. They have made us despise ourselves. They have made us look at ourselves in low esteem. They have made us their mental slaves. They have taught us to look at different factors in an isolated manner. They have made us to perceive them as Portuguese, French, Dutch, German, British. They have taken our sight off the sole driving force behind them that was Christianity.
Neither condemnation nor glorification in isolated manner is desirable. We need to accept both faces. Time has put its inerasable stamp on his conducts that stood one opposite the other. Both faces were true faces but in exclusive sense. One represented his irresponsible youth, the other showed his matured wisdom. The ChristianWest knows only to admire the irresponsible youth in humans. Old is not gold for them. ChristianWest treats old as spent force. This attitude is most evident in the manner they treat their old family members. The same attitude they have inculcated in us through six generations of ChristianizedEnglish education.
Prof M Monier-Williams claims Braahmanism must die out for it is incapable of imparting even basic knowledge and education and therefore, without the aid of Christianity the foundation of Hinduism will crack
Source: Modern India and the Indians, M Williams, 3rd edition 1879, p 261 quoted in Western Indologists A Study in Motives.htm, Purohit Bhagavan Dutt
Purohit Bhagavan Dutt: Monier-Williams, who revealed the real object of the purpose of the establishment of the Boden chair, thus delivers himself:
Monier-Williams: Braahmanism, therefore, must die out. In point of fact, false ideas on the most ordinary scientific subjects are so mixed up with its doctrines that the commonest education ~ the simplest lesson in geography ~ without the aid of Christianity must inevitably in the end sap its foundations.
Monier-Williams writes the Victory of Christianity will be Complete as the Soldiers of Cross will storm in, encircle and undermine the mighty fortress of Braahmanism
Source: Modern India and the Indians, M Williams, third edition 1879, p 262 quoted in Western Indologists A Study in Motives.htm, Bhagavan Dutt
Monier-Williams: When the walls of the mighty fortress of Brahmanism are encircled, undermined, and finally stormed by the soldiers of the cross, the victory of Christianity must be signal and complete.
Do you notice that it was an all out War by Christianity against Hinduism? For strategic reasons, they named it not Hinduism but Braahmanism
He writes "soldiers of Cross" must storm in to make Christianity victorious. What we see again and again that it was Christianity’s war. British or Macaulay were mere tools. Do not perceive them as the true offender. Or else, you will never find out who had been working against you day and night. It was the Cross, the Jesus, who had been working all the while to turn you Christian. He inspired his soldiers to adopt foul means. He was pulling the strings from behind the curtain. May be he was dead and buried but his ghost was still at work controlling the minds of these people whom you have mistakenly learned to respect.
1869 Principal Rudolf Hoernle wrote he hopes that Christianity will fill in the gap as Hindus give up Hinduism on persuasion of Swami Dayaanand of Aarya Samaj who may be able to convince Hindus that present form of Hinduism is in opposition to Veds
Source: The Christian Intelligence, Calcutta, March 1870, p 79 and A F R H quoted in The Arya Samaj by Lajpat Rai, 1932, p 42 quoted in Western Indologists A Study in Motives.htm, Purohit Bhagavan Dutt
Purohit Bhagavan Dutt: Rudolf Hoernle was the Principal of Queen’s College, Banaaras, in [*Vikram] Samvat 1926 (*AD 1869) [*even after the turn of a century, in 1966, Queen’s College commanded very high respect from the local students fraternity]. At that time Swami Dayaanand Saraswati, who later on founded the Arya Samaj happened to reach Banaaras for the first time for the propagation of his mission. Dr Hoernle met Swami Dayananda on several occasions. He wrote an article on Swamiji from which the following extract is noteworthy, because it reveals the real intention of many European scholars who take to study of Sanskrit and ancient scriptures of BhaaratVarsh. Hoernle says:
Rudolf Hoernle: He (Dayaanand) may possibly convince the Hindus that their modern Hinduism is altogether in the opposition to the Veds... If once they became thoroughly convinced of this radical error, they will no doubt abandon Hinduism at once ... They cannot go back to the Vedic state; that is dead and gone, and will never revive; something more or less new must follow. We hope it may be Christianity.
He writes Swami Dayananda may show Hindus that modern Hinduism is in totally opposition to Vaidik Hinduism, and this may lead Hindus to fall out of Hinduism, and while looking for a better alternative, they may embrace Christianity. Thus, he expected Swami Dayananda to play pawns in the hands of Christian manipulators. Rudolf Hoernle was right. Dayananda convinced a very small segment of Hindu society and brought it under the umbrella of Arya Samaj, effectively splitting the Hindu society.
Only five weeks ago, on 29 April 2007, I happened to be "accidentally" present, as an onlooker, at Silver Jubilee celebrations of Arya Samaj at Vashi, New Bombay. One celebrated scholar told the audience that Hindu is their first enemy, no Arya Samaji took objection. She also claimed that the popular anti-Hindu slogan "Raam Naam japna, paraya maal apna" was coined by Arya Samaj! One of the speakers mentioned of a debate between scholars of Arya Samaj and Hindus where Hindu scholar mentioned of "laghu shanka" where laghu shanka could mean small doubt or urination. Arya Samaji scholar replied "do laghu shanka and put it in your mouth" meaning urinate and put it in your mouth. The speaker implied that in this manner Arya Samaj scholars outwitted Hindu scholars in Shaastraarth (debate on scriptures).
It has been well propagated, and firmly implanted in the minds of Hindus, that Arya Samaj was formed to reform Hindus. I am not too sure as to how one can ever reform someone whom he thinks as his first enemy?
Christianity and Islam claim theirs is True God while Hindus’ god is false god. Arya Samaj claims that only Arya Samaj knows the path to True God and Hindu gods are all imaginary.
Arya Samajis claim they are on Hindu side when Muslims attack (Arya Samajis know that when Muslims attack Hindus, they also attack Arya Samajis). Arya Samajis know that they can live peacefully so long BhaaratVarsh is Hindu dominated (but they will be killed and raped if BhaaratVarsh becomes Muslim dominated much the same as in BanglaDesh and Pakistan). In spite of all this, an average Hindu has been kept under the impression that he should love and respect all of them who hate them!
1925 Professor Winternitz could not tolerate Schopenhauer placing Hindu Upanishads in high esteem
Source: Some Problems of Indian Literature, Calcutta 1925, p 61 quoted in Western Indologists A Study in Motives.htm, Purohit Bhagavan Dutt
Purohit Bhagavan Dutt: The pride of the superiority of their own philosophy and religion, and of the infallibility of their own conclusions has become so ingrained in the above-mentioned type of Western Sanskrit scholars that they feel no hesitation in giving expression to it brazen-facedly before the public. Reverent admiration of the philosophy of the Upanishads by Schopenhauer, often quoted by Bharatiya writers, ranked in the heart of the Europeans, and as late as AD 1925 Prof Winternitz thought it incumbent on him to denounce the sincere and heartfelt views of Schopenhauer in the following words:
Winternitz: Yet I believe, it is a wild exaggeration when Schopenhauer says that the teaching of the Upanishads represents ‘the fruit of the highest human knowledge and wisdom’ and contains ‘almost superhuman conceptions the originators of which can hardly be regarded as mere mortals...’
Winternitz found it necessary to pull down Schopenhauer and attempted to discredit him because Schopenhauer had unqualified reverence for Hindu Upanishads.
Winternitz claims that whatever little worth Hindu Veds may have they certainly do not match Hebrew religious documentations
Source: History of Indian Literature, 1927, p 79 quoted in Western Indologists A Study in Motives.htm, Purohit Bhagavan Dutt
Purohit Bhagavan Dutt: Not content with his invective (*abusive speech or oratory) against the Upanishads he had the audacity to deprecate even the greatness of the Veds by saying:
Winternitz: It is true, the authors of these hymns rise but extremely seldom to the exalted flights and deep fervor of, say, religious poetry of the Hebrews.
Old Testament, which was originally written in Hebrew, contains those religious poetry that Winternitz boasts about. We have already presented you with a few samples. You may have noticed what exalted flights they have had. Naturally, Hindu Veds could not have lowered themselves to those levels!
Ripley terms Hinduism as Curse for BhaaratVarsh
Source: Ripley’s ‘Believe it or Not’, Part I, 26th edition, Pocketbooks Inc., New York, p 14 quoted in Western Indologists A Study in Motives.htm, Purohit Bhagavan Dutt
Purohit Bhagavan Dutt: The climax of hatred against Hinduism is seen in the highly mischievous and provoking remarks like the following even in popular literature:
Ripley: The curse of BhaaratVarsh is the Hindu religion. More than two hundred million people believe a monkey mixture of mythology that is strangling the nation. ... He who yearns for God in BhaaratVarsh soon loses his head as well as his heart.
Professor McKenzie finds Hinduism devoid of ethics which prevents development of strenuous moral life; isn’t it rater amusing that these creatures define ethics and morality, who have none of it themselves
Source: vide ‘Ethics of India’, E W Hopkins, New Haven, 1924, Preface, pp x-xi quoted in Western Indologists A Study in Motives.htm, Bhagavan Dutt
Purohit Bhagavan Dutt: Prof McKenzie of Bombay finds the ethics of BhaaratVarsh defective, illogical and antisocial, lacking any philosophical foundation, nullified by abhorrent ideas of asceticism and ritual and altogether inferior to the ‘higher spirituality’ of Europe. He devotes most of his book ‘Hindu Ethics’ to upholding this thesis and comes to the triumphant conclusions that Hindu philosophical ideas,
Prof McKenzie: when logically applied [*Hindu philosophical ideas] leave no room for ethics, and they prevent the development of a strenuous moral life.
These people talk of morality?
Who will tell them that you do not look for ethics in the books and the rotten minds of intellectual whores who rent their intellect for money as did Max Muller (in his youth only to realize the blunder he had committed as he neared maturity) and so many others. The real-life application of ethics needs to be seen in the day to day acts of common people. Therefore, compare the real-life conducts of Hindu "people" over two millenniums, as documented by the foreigners visiting BhaaratVarsh, and then see the comparative moral bankruptcy of these celebrated "intellectuals" of Christianity.
Wonder why I use such harsh language?
Do you honestly think that they deserve any better? Wonder why I keep harping on their Christian lineage while you are used to hearing terms like British, German, European, Modern, Western, etc. Have you read their words carefully? Do you have any doubt left that it was not Christianity but some obscure nationality, or continentality, or modern view point, or East-West division that moved them in that direction?
Today you must show the courage to stand up and point fingers at them, those who did it all the while to you
I keep using the word Christian, again and again, over and again, so that you do not loose sight of the fact that it has all along been monotheist Christianity’s war against polytheist Hinduism with the sole objective of eliminating it from the face of the earth after having been successful in eliminating all other polytheist faiths that survived for thousands of years in every corner of the globe until the Avataar of Love Jesus Christ descended and cursed all non-Christians the eternal hell from which you couldn’t get a bail
Then began the systematic ethnic cleansing of all other faiths only to be given further momentum by advent of Islam which was essentially a Judeo-Christian by-product. You have failed to remember this finer aspect, and you always viewed them by their different nationalities as British, Portuguese, French, and so on. You have lost sight of this fundamental truth that it was not their nationality that drove them it was their Christian faith that drove them to eliminate you.
ChristianBritish finally succeeded in mentally enslaving you by replacing ancient Hindu education system with ChristianEnglish education system
Sir William Cecil Dampier holds Hinduism responsible for lack of its contribution towards science
Source: A History of Science, Cambridge University Press, 1948, 4th edition, p 8 quoted in Western Indologists A Study in Motives.htm, Bhagavan Dutt
Purohit Bhagavan Dutt: This vilification did not remain confined to Sanskrit scholars alone, but through them it percolated into the field of Science. Not knowing a word of the exact and multifarious scientific knowledge of the ancient Hindus, Sir William Cecil Dampier writes:
Sir William Cecil Dampier: Perhaps the paucity (*scarcity, smallness of quantity, fewness) of Bhaaratiya contribution to other sciences (the Philosophy and Medicine) may in part be due to the Hindu religion.
Which lack of contribution was he talking about? Let us see where Hinduism stood vis-à-vis sciences which they had no inclination to learn about.
To put the things in proper perspective it may be appropriate to bring-in here a few examples of Hindu contribution to Science so that it can respond to their anti-Hinduism propaganda on this count as well
Professor MacDonnell went on record saying Europeans learned plastic surgery from the Hindus who had already attained such heights in medical surgery that they could cut human hair longitudinally (lengthwise)
Source: History of Sanskrit Literature, Prof MacDonnell, quote in Vastu Relevance to Modern Times, Niranjan Babu, p 148
Professor MacDonnell: European surgery has borrowed the operation of rhinoplasty (formation of artificial noses) from BhaaratVarsh. They had attained such finesse in surgery that they could cut a hair longitudinally! The ancient medical men beginning from the great Dhanwantari (whose prescriptions were said to be infallible), Sushrut, Charak and others down the line were bold and skilful in their surgery. They conducted amputations, arrested bleeding by pressure, bandage or boiling oil, performed operations in the abdomen and uterus, cured hernia, fistula and piles, set broken bones and dislocations and could deftly remove foreign substances from the body. The great surgeon Sushrut is said to have advised dissection of dead bodies to a student of surgery and stressed the importance of knowledge gained from experiment and observation.
Stephen Knapp tells us that Yajur’Ved speaks of astronomy, geography, geology, medicinal plants, hydrostatics and electricity
Source: Stephen Knapp, The Secret Teachings of the Vedas, 1986, p 26 quoted in Western Indologists A Study in Motives.htm, Bhagavan Dutt
Yajur’Ved 6:21 Through astronomy, geography and geology, go through to all the different countries of the world under the sun. Mayest thou attain through good preaching to statesmanship and artisanship, through medical science obtain knowledge of all medicinal plants, through hydrostatics learn the different uses of water, through electricity understand the working of ever-lustrous lightning. Carry out instructions willingly
Stephen Knapp tells us that Yajur’Ved speaks of engineering, ships, airplanes
Source: Stephen Knapp, The Secret Teachings of the Vedas, 1986, p 26 quoted in Western Indologists A Study in Motives.htm, Bhagavan Dutt
Yajur’Ved 10:19 O royal skilled engineer, construct sea-boats, propelled on water by our experts, and airplanes, moving and flying upward, after the clouds that reside in the mid-region, that fly as the boats move on the sea, that fly high over and below the watery clouds. Be thou, thereby, prosperous in this world created by the Omnipresent God, and flier in both air and lightning.
Stephen Knapp tells us that Atharv’Ved speaks of atomic energy fission, ninety-nine elements, bombardments of neutrons, mass of molecular adjustments of the elements
Source: Stephen Knapp, The Secret Teachings of the Vedas, 1986, p 26 quoted in Western Indologists A Study in Motives.htm, Bhagavan Dutt
Atharv’Ved 20:41:1-3 The Atomic Energy fissions the ninety-nine elements, covering its path by the bombardments of neutrons without let of hindrance. Desirous of stalking the head, i.e., the chief part of the swift power, hidden in the mass of molecular adjustments of the elements, this atomic energy approaches it in the very act of fissioning it by the above-noted bombardments. Herein verily the scientists know the similar hidden striking force of the ray of the sun working in the orbit of the moon.
You think all these are wild imaginations? So, answer these questions for yourself
Do these all sound like wild imaginations, and day dreaming by the ancients? From your point of view, they could not have known about, conceptualized, and documented any of these things.
Well, for you the ancients did not have the technology
Let us say, you are proud of your printing technology. How many thousand years, these pages that you hold in your hand now, will last in good condition? Now, go back to the technology of the ancients. They wrote on leafs. You think that was primitive. Look at it differently. These leaf documents lasted for thousands of years. Look at the ink they used, whatever kind that may be. That too lasted for thousands of years.
Is this not technology?
Is your definition of technology limited to Internet which can bring you lots of pornography, and the television which can mature your kids before time by showing them lots of sex and violence? Is that the technology, but not the one which your ancients had?
Have you truly advanced?
Go and look at the Garud Dhwaj at Delhi and see the writing with Braahmi script on it. This huge iron pillar is standing there for thousands of years, un-rusted. Do you think your backward ancients could develop an iron pillar that could withstand tyranny of extreme weather conditions for thousands of years, undisturbed, unbent, and un-rusted!
What your advanced technology has developed to match that?
Whatever you have that all has to stand the test of time to prove, whatever may be your tall claims about, your modern technology! Until proven they are only assumptions, and claims that they will last so long is what you think but no one knows if it truly will. As compared to that, the technologies of the ancients have already proven them against test of time.
Another thing: whatever your modern science knows not today simply did not exist as per your belief system.
So, look at the following and realize for yourself how little your modern science knows, on whose knowledgebase you gloat over so much. Those things that your modern science did not teach you, you thought all that could not have existed. So, where from do the following things come up?
How is it that references to Rig’Ved clearly stated the speed of light with an amazing degree of precision?
Where was your modern science then? Michel Danino says that Sayana’s commentary on Rig’Ved clearly stated the Speed of Light with an amazing degree of precision
Source: Effects of Colonization on Indian Thought by Michel Danino, this paper was presented at a seminar on Decolonization and its Cultural Problems organized by N V Krishna Warrior Smaraka Trust at Tripunithura, Kerala, on 9-10 October 1999 quoted in IndiaCause Newsletter 17 Aug 2003
The speed of light is clearly given, to an amazing degree of precision, in Sayana’s commentary on the Rig’Ved.
Source: Michel Danino, Email 23 January 2005
Sayana, commenting on R’V 1.50.4, who records: In Sayana’s time, the yojan was about 14.5 km (as given in the ArthShaastr), and a nimesh 16/75th of a second. This takes us to 299,334 km/s, which is a mere 0.15% away from the accepted velocity of light (299,792 km/s). Even a different value for the yojan would remain of the same order.
Look at the level of precision in their mathematical calculations: they divided a second by 75 and calculated to that level of precision. And, that character Thomas Babington Macaulay and his followers convinced the world that we Hindus were primitive. Now what should I call them? Arrogant fools - no, that would be too mild a description for those rogues. If they had stopped at only that, may be one could have thought of pardoning them. But they went far beyond, and destroyed the entire establishment and the whole infrastructure of ancient Hindu Education System, and they did it systematically 'on purpose'. Their crime was far too great in comparison to barbarians of MuslimWorld. These rascals of ChristianWorld were far greater criminals in the eyes of humanity, and that is the place they should be given in the History. Glorifying those characters by addressing them as 'Lord' or 'Sir' is a matter of shame!
For once drop this egoistic idea that whatever modern science does not know till now or could not create as yet, Hindu ancients could not have known that or could not have created that ~ look at these Homo floresiensis, humans who lived from 90,000 years ago, and until as late as 12,000 years Before Christ ~ and, your modern science knew nothing about it until very recently
Source: The Times of India, Mumbai, 20 November 2004, editorial
A recent discovery has unearthed a completely new species of humans who lived from 90,000 years ago to as late as 12,000 BC before apparently becoming extinct. This species almost certainly coexisted, if not actually interacted, with our Cro-Magnon cousins. Identified by Australian and Indonesian scientists from a cache of fragmented bones buried in the sediments of a limestone cave on the remote Indonesian island of Flores, it has officially been named Homo floresiensis. This particular group of hominids were on average no taller than a meter or so, with a brain the size of a grapefruit. Nonetheless, they still managed to fashion delicate stone tools, light fires to cook food, organize group hunts for a dwarf species of elephant extant (*surviving) at that time, and possibly develop a proto-language of sorts along the way. Sounds too much like us to be true? Hard as it might be for us to accept, it could well be for real.
The discovery, heralded as one of the most important palaeo-anthropological finds in the last 50 years, has the potential to drastically change all the received wisdom gathered till now concerning human evolution. As one spokesperson of Natural History Museum in London says, it raises the whole issue of what it is to be human, or a member of the genus homo, and shows how little we know about our ancestry. The find also challenges our species-specific anthropocentrism of posturing as the greatest kids on the block to date. Because if it gets confirmed that a creature with so small a brain was capable of such advanced behavior ~ including perhaps even communication skills ~ then many theories about the evolution of our own intelligence might need to be hurriedly revamped. Actually, it appears we never learn. Remember our collective chagrin (*disappointment, annoyance, distress, humiliation) when we discovered that lowbrow “brutes” like Homo Neanderthals buried their dead with flowers? Homo floresiensis ~ or ‘Homo hobbitus’ as he’s been nicknamed because of his small size, reminiscent of J R R Tolkien’s Hobbits ~ suggests that there are many routes to what we call ‘humanity’. No single species can lay claim to the original planet.
“All the received wisdom gathered till now” meant only that little part of the wisdom, which the ChristianWorld could ever manage to acquire on their own. “How little we know” on account of the self-imposed limitation by egoist crusaders of Christianity and their burning desire to destroy a highly developed civilization and its documentations from which they could have learned a lot. They lost the readily available opportunity on account of their inflated sense of superiority. “Many theories about the evolution” have been developed by doing nothing substantial but indulging in intellectual luxuries, at enormous cost to the humanity, in trying to reinvent the wheel. “It appears we never learn”, but the question is how could you ever learn? To learn, first requirement would be to shove that ego down your own throat, and then humbly proceed towards the knowledgebase of those ancients, whom you all along condemned as ignorant, superstitious, and primitive.
Source: The Invasion That Never Was, p 18 quoting from fragments historiques sur l’Inde, Voltaire, Euvres Completes, Hachette, Paris, 1893, vol. 29, p 386
Voltaire: We have shown how much we surpass the Bhaaratiyas in courage and wickedness, and how inferior to them we are in wisdom.
But Christian sense of superiority would not allow them to accept it, leave aside learn anything from the Hindus
They had a simple option: if we cannot raise ourselves to their level, let us bring them down to our level. They also figured out the modus operandi.
Ch-2 Sanskrit was turned into a dead language within a matter of a century
I grew up under the impression that Sanskrit had been a dead language for over two thousand five hundred years, i.e., even before Buddh’s time
Prof M Monier-Williams inadvertently leaks away the true motive behind his compiling Sanskrit-English Dictionary
Lieutenant-Colonel Boden of the Bombay native Infantry returned to England in 1807 and died at Lisbon on 21 November 1811. His daughter died on 24 August 1827. His estate passed to the University of Oxford. In Vikram Samvat 1890 (*AD 1833) Horace Hayman Wilson became the first Boden Professor of Sanskrit at the Oxford University. His successor was Monier-Williams.
Source: A Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Monier-Williams, Preface, p IX
Monier-Williams: I must draw attention to the fact that I am only the second occupant of the Boden Chair, and that its Founder, Colonel Boden, stated most explicitly in his will (dated August 15, 1811 AD) that the special object of his munificent bequest was to promote the translation of Scriptures into Sanskrit; so as to enable his countrymen to proceed in the conversion of the natives of BhaaratVarsh to the Christian religion.
Take a note of this statement. The special object of Lt. Col. Boden’s will was to promote the translation of Scriptures into Sanskrit; so as to enable his countrymen to proceed in the conversion of the natives of BhaaratVarsh to the Christian religion.
Sanskrit was a thriving language until early 19th century
This leads us to the question: why would they want to translate scriptures (Bible) into Sanskrit, a supposedly dead language, instead of translating it into Bengali, Bhojpuri, Punjaabi, Raajasthaani, Maraathi, Oriya, Kannada, Telugu, Tamil, Malayaalam, Sindhi, Urdu, etc.? There could have been only one reason that could have prompted them to translate Christian Bible into Sanskrit and, that is, it was NOT a dead language. Was then Sanskrit well understood, and spoken, for day to day matters by a large enough section of people, who really mattered, so that they could be influenced by the Sanskrit translation of Bible?
The answer would be yes! Sanskrit was THE language that connected the whole of BhaaratVarsh into one thread like English does today. This does not mean that every man and woman on the road or in every village, needed to know how to speak in Sanskrit, as today NOT every man and woman on the road or in every village knows how to speak in English. Yet, some intellectuals write that English is the unifying factor for BhaaratVarsh but they do not care to recognize that Sanskrit did the same only about a century ago until ChristianBritish systematically uprooted Sanskrit from common use!
Sanskrit was one language that was used by all those (through the length and breadth of the country) who were teachers and guides to the society. And that is what mattered. And for this reason ChristianBritish wanted to influence them with Sanskrit translation of Christian Bible, hoping that they would in turn influence the rest of the people, as they were the teachers and guides to the society.
Did you have any idea of this?
No, you have learned that Sanskrit is a dead language. The image that you carry is: it had been dead and gone for ages, as far as we can think of.
What does this impression do to your thought process?
That the heritage we talk of is a lost cause, a matter of bygone days that even our memory cannot reach. Now, what’s the point bothering about it at all? English is the language of today, Sanskrit belongs to an unknown past. But how far is that past ~ only 100-150 years? Monier-William’s Sanskrit-English Dictionary was first published in 1899.
Does it NOT matter to you?
A language that was alive and thriving not so long ago has been consigned to total oblivion? And with that has gone the memory of your heritage, everything good that you possessed, everything superior that you possessed. That was done with an ulterior motive: to cut you off from your roots. And you have not been kept aware of it. Rather, means for you to get back to them have been removed from your easy reach.
Is that not a conspiracy against the entire society and Hindu civilization? Plenty of your Sanskrit manuscripts on science, law, history, geography, astronomy, philosophy, logic, humanities, name anything, have been handpicked and consigned to Vatican for recreating fraudulently modified versions, and to England for dumping, so that they could be never traced back. If any of them were translated into any European language (example: Rig’Ved) it was done not with a motive to show your heritage in a favorable light. It was done with a dirty motive to show your heritage in a very poor light. I had read and heard on various occasions that Max Muller did a great favor to Hinduism by translating Rig’Ved and letting the world know how great Hinduism is. Such false notions have been floating around for long and our generation after generation have been fooled.
Source: A Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Monier-Williams, Preface, p IX-X
Monier-Williams: seven years after its [*Sanskrit-English Dictionary] publication the following testimony to its utility was voluntarily tendered by the Rev J Wenger, translator of Bible into Sanskrit and Editor of Dr Yate’s Sanskrit Dictionary.
Rev J Wenger: I received a copy of Professor Monier Williams’ English and Sanskrit Dictionary at a time when I was about to commence a translation into Sanskrit of portions of the Old Testament. I have used it daily for the last seven years ... Bhaaratiya missionaries generally owe him a large debt of gratitude.
Now, you have the confirmation from Rev J Wenger who translated selectively some parts of Old Testament of Christian Bible. This dictionary was extensively used for translation of Bible into Sanskrit. I do not have to tell you that these translations of Bible were done with the sole purpose of converting Hindus into Christianity.
But we were given to understand that White Sahibs were learning our language as a tribute to our heritage! They used their new found knowledge of Sanskrit not to improve themselves but to lower us to their own level. Their true identity was not simply British, it was ChristianBritish. It was not their British nationality but their Christian faith, which consistently drove them to conspire against you.
You were taught to admire the British. In the process, you failed to notice the true motives of the ChristianBritish because you treated Christian and British in two separate compartments!
It is not my communal hatred that gives them that name. It is their communal hatred that justifies this as their true identity. However, the term communal hatred is never used for the Christians any where in the world. For them a softer term has been coined ‘racial hatred’. If they must use the harder term ‘communal hatred’ they reserve it for the Hindus, example: Narendra Modi.
They were paid for this work be it compilation of Sanskrit English Dictionary or be it translation of Bible into Sanskrit, and they were paid from our money which they acquired by plunder (systematic loot). In return of that payment, they were required to find ways and means to show Hinduism in poor light.
Their research was oriented towards a predefined objective to give shape to a predetermined action plan. Their research and scholastic efforts were not oriented towards seeking truth. You must learn one basic lesson that those not worthy of glorification must never be glorified.
Ch-3 They destroyed that ancient Hindu Education system and Hindu judicial system, which had consistently produced—for millenniums—'humans of such quality' that would make humanity proud
Source: Oxford Dictionary, p 1107
Macaulay 1st Baron (1800-59), a civil servant in BhaaratVarsh, where he established a system of education and a new criminal code.
In 1835 Macaulay instituted a new education system manned by Christian Missionaries. He organized to destroy the infrastructure that supported ancient Hindu Education system and ancient Hindu system of Judiciary. A nation that had a literacy rate higher than most other nations of Europe in those days, even at a village level, was reduced to an illiterate nation. Irony of the situation is that today we admire the conspirators and loath the victim. Conspirators are those who conspired to bring us to this lowly state. Victims are we, ourselves, who have been kept in dark as to how this illiteracy was imposed on us.
Source: Hist. of India, Elphinstone, I. 62, quoted in INDIA what can it teach us? Max Muller, p 231, n 44
Max Muller: Sir Thomas Munro estimated the children educated at public schools in the Madras presidency as less than one in three. But low as it was, it was, as he justly remarked, a higher rate than existed till very lately in most countries of Europe.
Source: Missionary Intelligencer, IX. 183-193, quoted in INDIA what can it teach us? Max Muller, p 231, n 44
In Bengal there existed no less than 80,000 native schools ...According to a Government Report of 1835, there was a village school for every 400 persons.
Source: British India, I. 62, Ludlow, quoted in INDIA what can it teach us? Max Muller, p 231, n 44
Ludlow (British India, I. 62) writes: In every Hindu village, which has retained its old form, I am assured that the children generally are able to read, write, and cipher; but where we have swept away the village system, as in Bengal, there the village school has also disappeared.
Thus, ChristianBritish eliminated the Hindu education system, and made people illiterate. They destroyed the entire structure and substituted by fewer schools run by ChristianBritish missionaries with an intent to Christianize the souls of students from early childhood.
Listen to it in their own words that they destroyed that education system with the sole objective of Christianizing Hindus
Macaulay was fiercely Christian in his thought and belief. He wanted to put Christian Bible in action. Christian Bible states “Idolaters to be put to death” [Deuteronomy 13 heading]. But in the 19th century he could not have pronounced physical death to idol worshipper Hindus. So, he chose to sentence them with ideological death.
Source: Effects of Colonization on Indian Thought, Michel Danino, quoted in IndiaCause Newsletter 17 Aug 2003
Michel Danino: That was what Macaulay, again, summarized best when he proudly wrote his father in 1836:
Macaulay: Our English schools are flourishing wonderfully ... It is my belief that if our plans of education are followed up, there will not be a single idolater among the respectable classes in Bengal thirty years hence.
The question is was he successful in his endeavor? Here we have a live example. Mahendr Nath Gupta, principal of the renowned Vidya Saagar School argues with Shri RaamKrishn ParamHans Dev about idolatry. He argues that people should not worship clay images of gods as it is wrong to do so. Where did he learn this? Obviously from the school he went for his education. As principal of a school, now he was teaching the next generation that they should not worship clay images. You would agree that Mahendr Nath Gupta, as the principal of renowned Vidya Saagar School was a befitting example of what Macaulay described as among the respectable classes in Bengal thirty years hence. Did it happen in thirty years from 1836? I do not know but I know for sure it did happen in forty five years from 1836 because Mahendr Nath Gupta [M] had an argument with Shri RaamKrishn ParamHans Dev in February 1882.
Source: Effects of Colonization on Indian Thought, Michel Danino, quoted in IndiaCause Newsletter 17 Aug 2003
Michel Danino: In the middle of the 1857 uprising, the Governor-General Lord Canning (*was it Cunning!) wrote to a British officials:
Governor-General Lord Canning: As we must rule 150 millions of people by a handful (more or less small) of Englishmen, let us do it in the manner best calculated to leave them divided ... and to inspire them with the greatest possible awe of our power and with the least possible suspicion of our motives.
• That is the beauty of their cunningness as clearly spelled out by none other than Canning. Do whatever you want to but with least possible suspicion of our motives!
Ch-4 How the ChristianBritish poisoned the minds of a vast majority of the Hindus by systematically pouring venom into the unsuspecting minds of the Hindu children who then went to Christian missionary schools for their education
They taught Hindus and told rest of the world
That: Aryans invaded our country in the second millennium BC and they drove out original inhabitants down south or in jungles.
That: They created the Caste system to maintain their superiority over the original inhabitants and called them Shoodr.
That: Their literature described the original inhabitants by various derogatory names like Daas, Dasyu, Asur, Naag, Raakshas.
That: Braahmans were the cunning lot, and they controlled the society and reaped rich dividend for themselves.
That: Braahmans destroyed Buddhism, Jainism because those were rationalists and humanitarian religions, as opposed to Braahmanism, which was essentially a useless ritual oriented, primitive, superstitious, and cruel in its caste administration.
That: Braahmanism Hinduism has been economically exploitative, socially oppressive, and supportive of culturally dilapidated caste system.
That: Braahmanical philosophies were essentially a fraud to hide their real character.
That: Hinduism alias Brahmanism has continued, and will continue to suppress, sidetrack, subvert by all possible means any other religious or secular movement that can threaten caste system and challenge supremacy of deceitful Braahmans.
That: Scientifically speaking, in above historical perspective, original inhabitants are the real high caste and present high castes are dirty swindlers.
The word Hindu was robbed of all its pride that it had acquired during past centuries
It was made synonymous to invaders who committed gross crimes against the natives. Come to think of it what a fraud it was: those very Braahmans who had given shape to Hindu society that displayed consistent behavior pattern over the millenniums ~ such character that had been applauded without an exception by so many foreign visitors ~ those very Braahmans were made nasty people today.
That: Aryans (Aarya +ɪÉÇ people) invaded our country in the second millennium before Christ, and they drove original inhabitants down south and to the jungles
Here we have an interesting analogy. ChristianBritish, greedy of imperialistic power, landed in four countries: present day USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. In each place they found original inhabitants. ChristianBritish occupied their lands and drove them to jungles. In BhaaratVarsh they could not do it because here they met with a civilization superior to their own.
So, what did they do?
They decided to teach false history to the original inhabitants in schools and colleges. Question they faced what should be that false history. They did not have to go far. They looked at their own doings. They remembered what they themselves had done with natives of present day USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. On similar lines they fabricated a story. That Aarya people came from some place probably in Europe. They did not say which place because they themselves did not know. Besides, they were afraid some one would go there and investigate, and their fraud will get exposed. So, they left the origin of Aarya people uncertain. They have not found out till today, as to from which imaginary place in Europe, these Aarya people came from. They have not been able to do so because they created that imaginary place from thin air. Historical fraud was nothing new to ChristianBritish. They had perfected the art already. They had practiced civilized frauds of one kind or another for grabbing title to the lands from the native Canadians.
What did they gain by doing that?
Advantages were several. If Hindu Aarya people actually came from outside BhaaratVarsh, and drove the original inhabitants down south or to jungles, then they were essentially foreigners to this land, as were the ChristianBritish. On that count, there was no particular difference between the two. Hence, there was no cause for resentment against foreign occupation by the ChristianBritish!
If Hindu Aarya people displaced original inhabitants from their ancestral land then they were essentially oppressors. On that count there was enough ground for Dravidians (those who had been driven down south) and Aadivaasis (those driven to jungles) to resent against foreign occupation by Hindu Aarya people, whereas there was not enough reason for resentment against ChristianBritish because they did not displace Dravidians and Aadivaasis.
If Hindu Aarya people were the oppressors and Dravidians and Aadivaasis were the oppressed ones for over past two thousand years, then this was sufficient impetus for sowing seeds of separatism between them. This would easily break the unity amongst them that had been so far achieved under one umbrella: Hinduism (or, Sanaatan Dharm as you may want to call it).
Who showed them the way to Divide and Rule? Jesus of Holy Bible! Surprised? Let us check Bible
Where did the ChristianBritish get the idea of divide and destroy the unity? Well, they learned it from their messiah Jesus Christ.
New Testament 2nd part of Christian Bible [Oxford p 1249]
Gospel the record of Christ’s life and teachings in the first four books of the New Testament [Oxford Dictionary p 792]
St Matthew - Apostle, author of 1st Gospel [Oxford Dictionary p 1143] (*one of the 12 chief disciples)
Matthew 10:34 Think not I am come to send peace on earth: I come not to send peace, but a sword. 10:35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against the mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. 10:36 And a man’s foe shall be they of his own household.
Luke 12:51 Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division: 12:52 For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three. 12:53 The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
Apostle - 12 chief disciples of Jesus Christ [Oxford p 77]
Source: The Myth of Saint Thomas, Ishwar Sharan, p 76 notes
Gospel of Thomas 16 Jesus said: Perhaps men think that I came to cast peace on the world; and they do not know that I came to cast division upon earth, fire, sword, war. For five will be in a house, there will be three against two and two against three, the father against the son and the son against the father. And they will stand because they are single ones.
That: they created the Caste system to maintain their superiority over the original inhabitants and called them Shoodr
This was an extension of the same divisive policy with intent to create rift between Shoodrs and other three Varn ´ÉhÉÇ in Hindu society. And they have been quite successful at it. There plan was to divide the Hindu society into pieces until it bleeds to death. What we see today in Uttar Pradesh, Bihaar, Madhya Pradesh and other provinces is a rather full blown picture of what had been conceptualized roughly six generations ago by the ChristianBritish, and propagated intensively and extensively by use of ChristianBritish education and media of every kind. After the British left, their stooges continued this task with renewed vigor. We speak here of six generations because it had been about 170 years from 1835, and it has been assumed that a new generation is ready in about thirty years.
The issue of 4 Varn ´ÉhÉÇ is very much misrepresented today, by friends and foes of Hinduism alike, and therefore, I have dealt with this subject in considerable depth in Gita Today. If you wish to acquire an insight into the subject from an entirely different perspective than what has been presented to you so far, all I could do is to request you to read those chapters in Gita Today without which your impressions on the subject will remain considerably flawed. However, I do reckon that it is only the 1st edition of Gita Today and the presentation may need improvement but you should be able to get a feel from the maiden edition.
That: their literature described the original inhabitants by various derogatory names like Daas, Dasyu, Asur, Naag, Raakshas
Again this has been a thorough misrepresentation because Hindu literature did not describe original inhabitants by those names. Those categories referred to certain attributes amongst people. For example, Aasuric culture referred to a specific type of culture, and the term Asur referred to those people who were part of that particular culture. I have dealt with this topic in Popes Saints Cardinals Archbishops Bishops. As for now I would want to say that it is not very difficult to identify these people even today. Just look around and see, you will find plenty of specimens around you. From that you will know who were the Asur and Raakshas in Hindu terminology. Such people existed even in those days. All you need is to understand the concept clearly to be able to identify them readily.
That: Braahmans ब्राह्मण not Brahmin ब्राह्मिन) were the cunning lot, and they controlled the society and reaped rich dividend for themselves
By and large Hindu Braahmans have been very poor and they kept themselves to priesthood and teaching. On the other hand, Christian and Muslim clergy have controlled national politics and governance of the State administration. Popes have done that for centuries and Khomeini, Taliban do it even today.
Source: The New Oxford Dictionary of English, p [as indicated below]
Hindu priests did not assume the role of their Christian and Islamic counterparts yet they have been made to look like them, on purpose with a predefined motive: to weaken the very foundation of Hindu Society
Source: A Hindu view of the World, N S Rajaram, p 38
Seven hundred years ago Pope Boniface VIII had asserted his secular authority in the following words: Both swords, the spiritual and the material [or secular], are in the power of the Church; the material for the Church. The one by the hand of the priest; the other by hands of kings and knights at the will and the sufferance [*toleration] of the priest.
They took clues from the deeds of Christian priests and rewrote the Hindu history depicting Hindu Braahmans in bad light. They taught this fabricated version of Hindu history to Hindu children generation after generation and created public opinion hostile towards Hindu Braahmans. They did not limit their propaganda to BhaaratVarsh but took it on a global scale. The need for this fabrication arose when there was conflict of interest, and the loosing party needed to resort to fabrication. The brain behind it was a person whom Christians call a Saint today. He has been granted the sainthood because he could give rise to a concept so apt for further development of a fabricated version of history that would stick. The dividends they reaped (not Braahmans but Christians) were so rich and the implications were so far reaching that Vatican could not but to offer sainthood to this person. Actually the very term “saint” has totally opposite (true) meanings in Christianity and Hinduism. This you will fully well understand when you read Popes Saints Cardinals Archbishops Bishops.
The name of this illustrious saint was Francis Xavier. He wrote to the Society of Jesus in his letter that if there were no Braahmans in Hindu society, he would have converted all Hindus into Christianity. Here was the conflict of interest.
He wanted to convert all Hindus into Christianity, but Hindus had little faith in the Christian Saint, and they had greater faith in Hindu Braahmans. Why they had greater faith? It is simple. Look at the character of Braahmans in general, read through the earlier parts of this work. They were truthful, honest, and simple like child. These are the descriptions by foreigners, not by Hindus. On the other hand, the Christian saint being untruthful and cunning, he described Braahmans as wicked and crafty men, in his letter to the Society of Jesus, and also documented the true reason for his hating Braahmans.
Source: St Francis Xavier The Man and His Mission, Sita Ram Goel, quoted in The Myth of St Thomas, Ishwar Sharan, p 80
Xavier wrote in another letter to the Society of Jesus, “There are in these parts among the pagans a class of men called Braahmans. They are as perverse and wicked a set as can anywhere be found, and to whom applies the Psalm, which says: ‘From an unholy race, and wicked and crafty men, deliver me, Lord.’ If it were not for the Braahmans, we should have all the heathens embracing our faith.”
That: Braahmans destroyed Buddhism, Jainism because those were rationalists and humanitarian religions, as opposed to Braahmanism, which was essentially a useless ritual oriented, primitive, superstitious and cruel in its caste administration
This was yet another historical fraud because it was Muslims who had uprooted Buddhism from BhaaratVarsh, not the Braahmans. On the contrary, Braahmans took care of Buddhist temple at BodhGaya when Buddhists abandoned it. It is the most significant temple of Buddhists in BhaaratVarsh because it was in Gaya that Buddh attained his enlightenment.
Source: Ayodhya, Koenraad Elst, p 36, p 38
Abdul Quddoos Ansari: The iconoclastic fury of Islam must have [had] a terrible effect on the shrines of the Gaya region, and particularly on Buddhism, with the result that a time came when, there being no Buddhists to look after their own shrines and worship at BodhGaya, the Braahmans had to do their work even by going [outside] their jurisdiction. [Archaeological Remains, p 119]
According to [the famous Tibetan monk] Dharma swami [1234-36 in that area], the BodhGaya establishment had been deserted by all except for [some] monks, on account of repeated Turkish conquests.’ [Archaeological Remains, p 26].
Koenraad Elst: The popular support base and training grounds for Buddhist monks were being destroyed in all of North BhaaratVarsh, and BodhGaya was dying as a Buddhist center along with all those other establishments that were being physically eliminated by the Turks. Not Hinduism but Islam destroyed Buddhism in BhaaratVarsh.
Source: A Hindu view of the world, N S Rajaram, p 163
Vincent Smith: The ashes of the Buddhist sanctuary at SaarNaath near Benaaras (Vaaraanasi) still bear witness to the rage of the image-breakers. Many noble monuments of the ancient civilization of BhaaratVarsh were irrevocably wrecked in the course of the early Muslim invasions. These invasions were fatal to the existence of Buddhism as an organized religion in northern BhaaratVarsh where its strength resided chiefly in Bihaar and certain adjoining regions.
Source: Art of Indian Asia, Heinrich Zimmer, Princeton, Paperback edition, 1983, Vol. I, p 201
Heinrich Zimmer: Buddhist and Hindu (Braahmanical) themes alternate in rich profusion. The two traditions flourished side by side, even sharing colleges and monasteries, for nearly two millenniums, until about the height of the Muslim conquest (c. AD 1200), Buddhism disappeared from the land of its birth.
That: Braahmanism Hinduism has been economically exploitative, socially oppressive, and supportive of culturally dilapidated caste system
Again this is yet another aspect of the same historical fraud, because if Hindu civilization could not be wiped out from the face of this earth despite hundreds of years of brutal, beastly onslaught by Muslims, it is due to the inherent strength of Hinduism, and Braahmanism was pivotal to this inherent strength. And for this very reason, it has been so very necessary for Christianity (and later day Communism) to focus its entire offensive strategy towards Braahmanism.
Ch-5 The legacy goes on and lies keep compounding through the efforts of those who were raised by Christian English education system and influenced by Marxist thinking
For this ChristianBritish needed to prepare a brigade of Hindu born Christianized cadre to give impetus to the offensive. Out of this was born Jawaharlal Nehru who took pride in saying: I am a Christian by education, Muslim by inclination and Hindu by accident!
Source: A Hindu View of the World, N S Rajaram, p 181
Macaulay: We must at present do our best to form a class who may be interpreters between us and the millions whom we govern; a class of persons, Bhaaratiyas in blood and color, but (*Christian) English in taste, in opinions, in morals and in intellect.
These historical fabrications were continually taught in schools and colleges controlled and run by ChristianBritish establishments and Christian missions. From the ‘twenties of last century’ these started finding place in Communist pamphlets and periodicals. Mounting this wave, one section of the Indian National Congress started strutting around as progressive, radical, revolutionary, socialist.
Jawaharlal Nehru
In 1927 Jawaharlal visited Soviet Union briefly and after his return became the leader of this progressive, radical, revolutionary, socialist group. Then he wrote Glimpses of World History and Discovery of India, which reveled in this lore. It was held classics in prestigious press in BhaaratVarsh and overseas. This is when Nehru started fancying himself as a great historian. During his daughter Indira Gandhi’s regime a TV serial was made on Nehru’s book Discovery of India by one those prominent FakeSecular intellectual directors using taxpayers’ money. It was regularly telecast during 1980’s, and was repeated in 2000’s. They make sure that this garbage is filled in the minds of each new generation.
Professor Muhammad Habib of Aligarh Muslim University
Muslim historians of Marxist school came up with another innovation. Muhammad Habib of Aligarh Muslim University fabricated a new theory that Islamic invaders destroyed Hindu temples not because Islam taught Muslims to do so but because they wanted to loot those temples for their wealth. This fabrication was aimed at salvaging blood-soaked history of Islam. Jawaharlal Nehru and his so-called progressive sect in the Indian National Congress immediately welcomed this theory with open arms.
Pundit Sunderlal
Well, Pundit Nehru and Habib were not alone but there were more of the likes. When something new starts gaining popularity others too join the bandwagon. So came along Pundit Sunderlal and he painted Islam and the Medieval Muslim Rule in glorious colors.
M N Roy
Then came another of the lot: M N Roy. He innovated yet another theory. That is, Islam came to BhaaratVarsh with a great purpose: to complete a social revolution. And what that revolution was? Well, that was to complete the unfinished task of Buddhism. It was unfinished, in his mind, because those supposedly cunning Braahmans used fire and sword to finish Buddhism.
Sanskrit educated Braahmans of yesteryears and English educated Braahmans of today
Education can do wonders to human mind and thought. Ancient Hindu education turned Braahmans into truthful lot and Modern Christian education turned them into cunning liars. Pundit is a Braahman title and I think Roy also.
All-out attack on Hinduism
One thing seemed to be very clear: there was an all-out attack on Hinduism from every possible direction with one motive, that is, to obliterate it.
The stubborn Hinduism does not give up
But, this Hinduism was too stubborn. It would not give up, and it would not die howsoever hard one tried. Islam tried for hundreds of years, Christianity tried also for centuries since ChristianPortuguese landed in Goa and established notorious papal (pope’s) Inquisition. The more stubborn Hinduism remains, more new fanatics are born to obliterate it. Only they change their method, when one fails the other gets ready! ChristianWorld gave such conspirators a respectable position in the society. With all these onslaughts Hinduism was not yet exhausted. Probably there was too much strength remained hidden somewhere, unseen, but it was there. It would not simply get lost, and so will be the invaders, in one form or other. The term Hindu still covered, by and large, Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs. Swami Dayaanand, Bankim Chandr Chatterjee, Swami Vivekananda, Shri Aurobindo had probably seen through the ChristianBritish game in different measures. Shri RaamKrishn ParamHans Dev had silently prepared Vivekananda for the ordeal.
Abuse of the Constitution of BhaaratVarsh
Source: Pseudo-Secularism, Sita Ram Goel, c 4
The Constitution of independent BhaaratVarsh adopted in January 1950 made things quite smooth for the Christian missions. They surged forward with renewed vigor. Nationalist resistance to what had been viewed as an imperialist incubus during the Struggle for Freedom from British rule, broke down when the very leaders who had frowned upon it started speaking in its favor. Voices which still remained ‘recalcitrant’ (*willfully disobedient) were sought to be silenced by being branded as those of ‘Hindu communalism’. Nehruvian Secularism had stolen a march under the smokescreen of Mahaatma Gandhi’s Sarv-Dharm-Sambhaav. The Christian missionary orchestra in BhaaratVarsh after independence has continued to rise from one crescendo to another with the applause of the Nehruvian establishment manned by a brood of self-alienated Hindus spawned by missionary-Macaulayite education.
Jawaharlal Nehru as the first Prime Minister
After independence from the ChristianBritish, Nehru became the supreme power and he became the combined spokesman of Islamic, Christian and Communist imperialistic ideologies. To further his designs he placed the Ministry of Education in the hands of a Muslim Marxist combine headed by Maulaana Abul Kalam Azad. Simultaneously he gave Christian missions full freedom and encouragement to teach and convert Hindus as much as possible. He also patronized the Communist Party of BhaaratVarsh such that soon it became a formidable force. He let Muslim-Marxist combine of ‘historians’ to capture the Indian History Congress and let them drive out many honest historians. And this was facilitated by Westernized democratic system of which we are so proud of.
Muhammad Habib and Jawaharlal Nehru join hands
In 1954 Professor Muhammad Habib came up with another thesis that Hindu working class had preferred Shariat and Turks and Muslim conquest was an ‘urban revolution’ and ‘turn of public opinion’. Nehru approved this thesis in a Preface despite the fact that so-called working class and Shoodrs fought shoulder-to-shoulder with so-called Hindu upper class in their struggle with Muslim barbarians. If Hindu working class had truly favored Shariat why they did not adopt Islam without struggle and without bloodshed? Why Muslim barbarians had to offer the working class Hindus one of the two choices: Islam or death? Why did they have to kill innocent working class Hindu civilians, old men, women and children? Why did they have to enslave working class Hindu women and children to convert them into Islam? It is truly unfortunate for the nation that our leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru, in whose hands Hindu BhaaratVarsh had given its rein, had such a questionable character. I dare say ‘Hindu BhaaratVarsh’ because Jinnah had taken away Muslim Pakistan, and he had even offered Nehru to exchange left over Muslims in BhaaratVarsh, in lieu of left over Hindus in Pakistan.
Ethnic cleansing continues unabated
Nehru turned it down and the result is today Pakistan and BanglaDesh have barely enough Hindus left on account of systematic ethnic cleansing over past 50 years, whereas Bhaaratiya Muslims have multiplied many fold and enjoyed better privileges in comparison to their counterparts in Pakistan, legally granted to them such privileges on the pretext of minority protection. Enormous Hajj subsidy is one such example, and FakeSecular Nehru is the author.
Source: Hindu Voice, March 2005 Hindi edition, cover 3
1947 24% Hindus in Pakistan but now less than 1%
1947 30% Hindus in BanglaDesh but now about 7%
Ch-6 Effectively, the Hindus became the true Minority on their own soil for all practical purposes
Source: Pseudo-Secularism, Sita Ram Goel, p 7
The first Prime Minister of independent BhaaratVarsh became the leader of a Muslim-Christian-Communist combine for forcing Hindus and Hinduism first on the defensive and then on a run for shelter. Now on everything, which Hindus held sacred could be questioned, ridiculed, despised and insulted. At the same time the darkest dogmas of Islam and Christianity were not only placed beyond the pale of discussion but also invested with divinity so that anyone who asked any inconvenient questions about them invited the attention of laws which were made more and more punitive.
Would you like an example of the above statement “now on everything, which Hindus held sacred could be questioned, ridiculed, despised and insulted”? Here is one:
Source: The Pioneer, OP-ED, 3 June 2003
Take, for example, what Hussain painted. He has not only portrayed some Hindu deities in the nude but has gone to the extent of showing Sita masturbating on the long tail of Hanumaan!
Here we see that a famous Muslim painter (who lives on this soil where 80% population still comprises of Hindus though gradually declining) can boldly disrespect the sentiments of Hindus (Mother Sita has been the example of purity) and we have no right to be angered by it. If we express our anger, it is promptly denounced by the secularists who occupy significant positions.
Source: A Hindu view of the world, N S Rajaram, p 187
As far as the Macaulayite elite is concerned, it is the fear of the rise of the nationalism, which has brought it into the arms of the Muslim Fundamentalist forces. It defends vociferously M F Hussein’s ‘artistic’ right to desecrate Hindu icons, but remains tongue tied when Salmaan Rushdie and Taslima Nasreen are threatened with death for blasphemy. It holds on to discredited history like the Aryan invasion of BhaaratVarsh because rejecting it would make BhaaratVarsh the home of a great and ancient civilization. It attacks Natwar Jha and this writer for providing a solution to the puzzle of the Indus script because it means going to the Vedic sources to find the answer. All this, testimony to the greatness of BhaaratVarsh’s past, this elite finds intolerable.
Nehru’s daughter Indira became the Prime Minister soon after Nehru’s death and to ensure her monopoly of power, she split the Congress Party. She gave positions of power in Central and State Governments, and in prestigious institutions, to well known Communists and fellow-travelers. Politicians love power so much that they would go to any length to attain their objectives. ICHR was placed under control of Muslim-Marxist combine ‘historians’ and they were given extensive patronage. NCERT was taken over by these people and they laid down guidelines for producing school textbooks on various subjects and rewrote the fraudulent history with substantial amount of fabrication. JNU was created and financed on fabulous scale. Communist professors from all over the country were brought to JNU to form the frontline brigade to launch all out assault on Hindu society by way of anti-Hindu campaigns. The slogan of secularism was given tremendous impetus and no one was supposed to question or examine if it was being used with its true meaning, or otherwise. Its meaning in Bhaaratiya context was attributed by this Muslim-Marxist combine as it served their purpose. The political backing to this manipulated concept was so enormous that no questions were supposed to be asked. The new meaning was to be taken for granted. The political support, the academic thrust, and the media coverage together made anything that was related to Hinduism, and Nationalism, as ‘Communalism’. This is when ‘Hindu’ started becoming a dirty word. Sikhs had opted out of Hindu fold and Jains started becoming more vocal that they were not Hindus. In the context of Sikhs, many readers who have not known it, may find it surprising that till lately every good Hindu family donated their one son to Sikhism. This means, from every good Hindu family one son became Sikh, so thin was the line between Hinduism and Sikhism.
Source: Hindu Voice, Nov 2002, p 40
Francois Gautier: The Sikhs, because they had to defend themselves against the terrible persecution by the Muslims, cut themselves from the mainstream spirit of Hindu tolerance from where they originally came. But do they not come from the great Hindu family? Has not till lately every good Hindu family donated one of their sons to Sikhism? Do not Hindus still today go to Gurudwaras?
Source: Hindu Temples what happened to them, Sita Ram Goel, p 407
The climax came when the Ramakrishna Mission and the Arya Samaj petitioned the High Courts for obtaining the status of non-Hindu religions. An article in the Constitution, which gave certain concessions to non-Hindu educational institutions, was being cited in defense of this volte-face. But that was only an excuse. The real reason was that nobody who thought he was somebody was prepared to be known as Hindu any more.
Source: Hindu Temples what happened to them, Sita Ram Goel, p 407
The Bhaaratiya Jan Sangh had been launched by some Hindus who were already shying away from the word ‘Hindu’, and opting for the word ‘Bhaaratiya’. It was taken over in due course by a pompous Nehruvian, and whoever objected to the coup was hounded out, or silenced. The party was now trying frantically to prove its Secular credentials. It was mortally afraid of being called a Hindu party, and frequently displayed its Muslim membership. Its tragedy was that the authentic secularists were not prepared to accept its claims, although it had invited every stalwart of Secularism to use its platform for delivering lectures on the sanctified subject. Again, the climax came when, under pressure from the newly formed Janata Party of which Bhaaratiya Jan Sangh had become a constituent, the RSS also got ready to consider dropping of the word ‘Hindu’ from its constitution. One wonders how things would have turned out if the Janata Party government had not fallen before the critical session of the RSS could be held. In any case, leaders of Bhaaratiya Janata Party, the reincarnation of the Bhaaratiya Jan Sangh, could be heard saying till recently that they could no more afford to be known as Hindus (ab apne aapko Hindu kahne se kaam nahi chalega)!
EPILOGUE
You may need to know this unless you want to invite it again in your life. Do not think that times have changed and it will not happen again. It has been happening in Pakistan and BanglaDesh for past 50 years. It will happen here with demographic changes taking place rapidly. What will happen that we will discuss in another chapter.
Inferno that Max Muller spoke of leaving so much untold
Now we go back to the pre-ChristianBritish period
Source: INDIA what can it teach us? Max Muller, p 66
Max Muller: after reading the accounts of the terrors and horrors of Mohammedan rule, my wonder is that so much of native virtue and truthfulness should have survived.
How so much of native virtue and truthfulness survived?
How strong may have been the roots? How great must have been the foundation that the structure survived the onslaught. What was that foundation? Hindu social structure, of course. On what premise that structure was built? 4-Varn system, obviously! They were 4 pillars
How the nation survived?
Source: INDIA what can it teach us? Max Muller, p 50
Max Muller: When you read the atrocities committed by the Mohammedan conquerors of BhaaratVarsh … to my mind, is how any nation could have survived such an inferno, without being turned into devils themselves.
No, they did not turn into devils themselves until then
It was not Islam’s doing—Islam came as a tornado, it broke, destroyed, looted, raped, killed but they could not break the backbone of Hindu society
The reason was simple— The foundation was strong—The strength lied in social justice and love of truth.
[But Christian and Communist propaganda has convinced the world that there was no social justice but there was grave injustice in form of caste system.]
How they fought back?
Source: Arise Again, O India! Francois Gautier, p 46
Will Durant: The Islamic conquest of BhaaratVarsh is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without and multiplying within.
Hindu society bled but not to death—It recovered after each blow—It built in more resistance as time passed— Hindu bodies were slaved but not the Hindu minds
Islam on its last leg
Finally, Islam was exhausted. They had run out of strength. It had happened before to Alexander who has been bestowed with the title ‘the Great’. He had to take retreat. Selucus had to offer his daughter in marriage to ChandrGupt Maurya to make peace. It was about to happen to Islam. ChhatrPati Shivaaji had broken the backbone of Mogul Empire. It was on its last leg. Hindus were about to heave a sigh of relief.
Games that ChristianBritish played
Destiny had something else on the platter. There was a Meer Zaaffer. And there was the legendry betrayal in connivance with the British. Back door was left ajar for the ChristianBritish. Hindus were no match for their cunningness and deception. It was not a battle of strength. The rules of the game that ChristianBritish played were unknown to the Hindus.
The beginning of the great Fall
This was the ‘true’ beginning of fall of Hindu society— With time Hindu minds were enslaved—Those minds could no more direct the bodies to fight back—Minds were thoroughly confused—They were made incapable of distinguishing between the friend and the enemy.
The divide was made
This is when Hindus learned many new things—They learned that Braahmans were not the original inhabitants of the land—They were the invaders from some place in the Europe—They occupied the Hindu land—They pushed the natives to the down south and to the jungles—They were illegitimate occupiers—They were oppressors—They deserved nothing but hatred and enmity from the natives of the land—Those who were the true sons of the soil were now known as Dravidians, Aadivaasis, and Shoodrs —The divide was made!
Those who had mastered the art of deception
This was not a brilliant invention—This was the same good old trick that liars always employ
Behind every major lie there has to be an equally major truth—Lie cannot exist on its own—It always needs the crutches of the truth
Truth is what always stands on its own legs even after it has been crippled for too long—And to make truth cripple you need those who have mastered the art of deception.
Switching the Actors
ChristianBritish did not need to be innovative at all. They had the whole story in their backyard already. Remember what they did in the Americas? How they pushed the natives to the jungles? Look into the history of Canadian natives. Perhaps the same story was repeated again in the Australia and the New Zealand—
Brainwashing the children
Finally the Sun set
Then came a time when Hitler broke the backbone of mighty British Empire, and the Sun which never set for the Empire was now gradually making its return to the darkness of night.
But by now new crops had been harvested
The worthiest stooge was the one who called himself ‘a Christian by education, a Muslim by inclination and a Hindu by accident’. This was actually the description of a crossbred hotchpotch who knew not his roots.
The legacy goes on
He became the Prime Minister and the dynasty he formed [masked as democracy] continued the legacy of fabricating history.
This page was last modified on Monday, 06 September 2010 08:38 PM GMT+05:30